Opinion
Case No. SC04-2203.
April 14, 2005.
Lower Tribunal No. 2D03-5183.
As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the reinstatement of Harry Paul Hett v. State of Florida, case number 2D03-5183, dismissed by the Second District Court of Appeal on March 30, 2004, for lack of jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.