From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hester v. Thomas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 7, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv207-TMH (M.D. Ala. Aug. 7, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv207-TMH

08-07-2014

CHAD HESTER, # 220402, Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND OPINION

On July 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 45). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that:

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 33) is GRANTED.

2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants and against plaintiff; and

3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Done this the 7th day of August, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hester v. Thomas

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 7, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv207-TMH (M.D. Ala. Aug. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Hester v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:CHAD HESTER, # 220402, Plaintiff, v. KIM THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 7, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv207-TMH (M.D. Ala. Aug. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

Bingham v. Taylor

A prisoner does not have a constitutional right to be housed in a particular area of the prison. Hester v.…