Opinion
21882-21
12-18-2023
NICHOLAS HESSION & PATRICIA HESSION, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge
On June 16, 2021, petitioners filed the petition. On September 9, 2021, the Court issued an order directing petitioners to pay the filing fee. On August 4, 2022, the Court entered an Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the filing fee was not paid.
On December 13, 2023, petitioners filed a Letter Re Payment of Filing Fee, which is more akin to a Motion to Vacate. The filing fee in this case remains unpaid.
A motion to vacate a decision generally must be filed "within 30 days after the decision has been entered, unless the Court shall otherwise permit." Rule 162, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Furthermore, the Tax Court generally cannot consider a motion to vacate that is made after a decision becomes final. Abatti v. Commissioner, 859 F.2d 115, 118 (9th Cir. 1988), aff 'g, 86 T.C. 1319 (1986). A decision becomes final "[u]pon the expiration of the time allowed for filing a notice of appeal, if no such notice has been duly filed within such time." Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) section 7481(a)(1). The notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days to be timely. I.R.C. sec. 7483. Petitioners filed their motion to vacate more than a year after the Order of Dismissal for Lack of Jurisdiction was entered in this case on August 4, 2022. Accordingly, the Court's decision was already final when petitioners filed their motion to vacate.
Once a decision becomes final, the Court's jurisdiction to revise or vacate that decision is severely limited. As discussed in Snow v. Commissioner, 142 T.C. 413, 419-420 (2014), as a general rule, the finality of a decision is absolute, with the few following exceptions: (1) where there was fraud on the Court, (2) where the Court never acquired jurisdiction to make a decision, and (3) where the Court needs to correct a clerical error in the decision discovered after the decision has become final. Petitioners have not shown that any of these exceptions apply to this case.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that petitioners' Letter Re Payment of Filing Fee, filed December 13, 2023, is recharacterized as petitioners' Motion to Vacate. It is further
ORDERED that petitioners' Motion to Vacate is denied.