Opinion
March 2, 1971.
Charles R. Hesser, pro se.
Daniel B. Rakov for the defendant.
The plaintiff appealed from a final decree declaring, inter alia, that the written lease between the parties had expired and that the plaintiff was a tenant at will. There is no doubt that the trial judge was correct. It is equally clear that this appeal is devoid of any merit. The decree is affirmed. Double costs are to be paid by the plaintiff.
So ordered.