From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herzog v. Tamsen

City Court of New York, General Term
Feb 1, 1898
22 Misc. 766 (N.Y. City Ct. 1898)

Opinion

February, 1898.

Aaron Morris, for appellants.


The right of the appellants to be brought in as parties defendant is absolute, and this being so, the court cannot require security for costs as a condition for granting such right. Uhlfelder v. Tamsen, 18 Misc. 173; 40 N.Y.S. 372.

It follows that that part of the order appealed from should be reversed, with costs.

FITZSIMONS, Ch. J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Herzog v. Tamsen

City Court of New York, General Term
Feb 1, 1898
22 Misc. 766 (N.Y. City Ct. 1898)
Case details for

Herzog v. Tamsen

Case Details

Full title:THEOPHILE HERZOG, Respondent, v . EDWARD J.H. TAMSEN, as Sheriff, Etc.…

Court:City Court of New York, General Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1898

Citations

22 Misc. 766 (N.Y. City Ct. 1898)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Winn

Code 1923, § 7249; Ex parte Shuptrine, 204 Ala. 111, 85 So. 494; Ex parte Blackburn, 204 Ala. 132, 85 So.…