From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herzman v. Ainsworth

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 31, 1979
607 P.2d 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 78-797-L-3, CA 13717

Submitted on record and briefs October 19, 1979

Affirmed December 31, 1979

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County.

Ted Abram, Judge.

Lee S. Werdell, Medford, filed the brief for appellant.

Stanley C. Jones, Klamath Falls, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Lee and Richardson, Judges.


JOSEPH, P.J.

Affirmed.


]EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]


This is a tort action to recover damages for tortious interference with the business relations of plaintiff and another person. The trial court ruled that there was no evidence of any damage to plaintiff and directed a verdict in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. His sole assignment of error is that the trial court's directing a verdict was improper.

We have reviewed the record and agree that plaintiff failed to prove damages and therefore failed to prove all of the elements of the tort as most recently delineated in Top Serv. Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 283 Or. 201, 582 P.2d 1365 (1977).

Affirmed.


]EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]


Summaries of

Herzman v. Ainsworth

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 31, 1979
607 P.2d 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Herzman v. Ainsworth

Case Details

Full title:HERZMAN, Appellant, v. AINSWORTH, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 31, 1979

Citations

607 P.2d 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
607 P.2d 744