From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hertzog v. Fraker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Feb 14, 2012
No. 11-cv-5850 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-cv-5850 RBL

02-14-2012

GEORGE PHILIP HERTZOG, JR., Plaintiff, v. RONALD FRAKER, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and the relevant record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #11].
(2) The case is TRANSFERRED to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal as a second habeas petition, pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a).
(3) The Clerk shall administratively close the file.
It is so ordered.

___________________________

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hertzog v. Fraker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Feb 14, 2012
No. 11-cv-5850 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Hertzog v. Fraker

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE PHILIP HERTZOG, JR., Plaintiff, v. RONALD FRAKER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

No. 11-cv-5850 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Spencer v. Cano

The applicability of Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a) does not turn on the subjective intention or understanding of…

Henderson v. Madden

"A district court's obligation to follow Circuit Rule 22-3(a) does not, and cannot, turn on the subjective…