From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 18, 2009
Civil Action No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Dec. 18, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS.

December 18, 2009


ORDER


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant Luzenac America, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Experts Richard Whalen and Bruce Berglund [Doc # 247] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to refile by a date certain to be set by the magistrate judge; and

2. Defendant Luzenac America, Inc.'s Alternative Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Richard Whalen as Being Moot and/or Irrelevant [Doc # 315] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to re-file by a date certain to be set by the magistrate judge.


Summaries of

Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 18, 2009
Civil Action No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Dec. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD LEE HERTZ, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. LUZENAC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 18, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Dec. 18, 2009)