From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 29, 2010
Civil Case No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Apr. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS.

April 29, 2010


ORDER


On February 4, 2010, Luzenac America, Inc., filed a Combined Partial Motion to Dismiss Hertz's Retaliation Claim Based on Luzenac Suing IMI Fabi and Objection to Order Granting Hertz's Motion to Amend Complaint (docket #393). This combined motion is improperly filed as one motion, it is

ORDERED that Luzenac's Combined Partial Motion to Dismiss Hertz's Retaliation Claim Based on Luzenac Suing IMI Fabi and Objection to Order Granting Hertz's Motion to Amend Complaint (docket #393) is STRICKEN WITH LEAVE TO REFILE as two separate motions. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Luzenac's Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72 Objection to the Magistrate Judge's order shall be received as if filed on the date of the previously improperly filed motions, February 4, 2010, and shall be deemed a timely filed objection under Rule 72(b)(2).


Summaries of

Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 29, 2010
Civil Case No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Apr. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Hertz v. Luzenac America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD LEE HERTZ, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. LUZENAC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 29, 2010

Citations

Civil Case No. 04-cv-01961-LTB-CBS (D. Colo. Apr. 29, 2010)