However, if the question is cast in terms of the larger issue of the execution of the document, we do have an instructive case. In Hertz Corp. v. Domerque, 293 So.2d 463 (Miss. 1974), the well-known car rental agency sued a Mississippi citizen who had rented one of its cars in Nevada, damaged it and refused to pay. The action was based on Nevada's long-arm statute, but in deciding whether or not to give full faith and credit to the Nevada judgment, this Court was bound to consider whether or not Nevada's personal jurisdiction over the defendant was permissible under the standards of International Shoe and its progeny.

On today's facts, Carl Anthony Jones is on principle amenable to suit here as a matter of this state's positive law. See also, Hertz Corporation v. Domergue, 293 So.2d 463 (Miss. 1974). The Chancery Court held Jones amenable to Rule 4, Miss.R.Civ.P. Jones charges this was error, and we agree.

Educational Placement Services v. Wilson, 487 So.2d 1316, 1320 (Miss. 1986); Hertz Corp. v. Domergue, 293 So.2d 463, 466 (Miss. 1974). To determine the validity of the Illinois judgment in Mississippi we must look to the law of the State of Illinois.