Even if Appellant failed to fully understand the MSA, his lack of understanding did not invalidate the agreement. See Herszage v. Herszage, No. 13-06-257-CV, 2007 WL 2323979, at *6-8 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Aug. 16, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op.) (holding that wife's failure to adequately inspect agreement's terms did not invalidate the Section 6.602 agreement in that case because parties to a Section 6.602 agreement must protect themselves by reviewing the agreement before signing). Appellant also claims that the MSA is void because he signed it under duress, undue influence, and coercion.
"If a mediated settlement agreement meets [those] requirements[,] . . . a party is entitled to judgment on the mediated settlement agreement notwithstanding Rule 11 . . . or another rule of law." Tex. Fam. Code. Ann. § 6.602(c); see also Herszage v. Herszage, No. 13-06-00257-CV, 2007 WL 2323979, at *4-5 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi Aug. 16, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op.). An agreement that meets the requirements of section 6.602 is "more binding than a basic written contract."