From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hersey v. WPB Partners, LLC

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 24, 2010
Civil No. 10-cv-486-LM (D.N.H. Nov. 24, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-cv-486-LM.

November 24, 2010


ORDER


Upon removal this court treats state court counsel of record as counsel of record in this court. In an attachment to plaintiff's pro se objection to the pending motion to dismiss, Attorney Hanson represents that he was providing limited representation to the plaintiff in state court, that he is not a member of this court's bar, and that it is his understanding the plaintiff will be representing herself pro se in this case. Based on this representation and the fact that the plaintiff has filed a pro se objection to the motion to dismiss, the court will suspend both the requirement that Attorney Hanson file a motion to withdraw (LR 83.6(d)) and the local rule that prohibits represented litigants from filing pleadings in a case (LR 4.3(e)). Therefore, Attorney Hanson shall be permitted to withdraw as counsel in this case and Ms. Hersey shall be permitted to represent herself pro se.

SO ORDERED.

November 24, 2010


Summaries of

Hersey v. WPB Partners, LLC

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Nov 24, 2010
Civil No. 10-cv-486-LM (D.N.H. Nov. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Hersey v. WPB Partners, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Mary Hersey v. WPB Partners, LLC

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Nov 24, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-cv-486-LM (D.N.H. Nov. 24, 2010)

Citing Cases

McCarthy v. WPB Partners, LLC

WPB removed the case to federal court on October 25 and moved to dismiss McCarthy's claims. See Hersey v. WPB…