From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herschman v. Decicco of Katonah, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 27, 2022
22-CV-8890 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-8890 (KMK)

10-27-2022

VICKI HERSCHMAN, Plaintiff, v. DeCICCO OF KATONAH, LLC; JAMES CAPRIOTTI; AND CHRISTINA DeCICCO, Defendants.


ORDER OF SERVICE

KENNETH M. KARAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 to 297, alleging that her former employer discriminated against her based on her race, color, religion, and age. (See Compl. (Dkt. No. 2).) By order dated October 25, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees. (See Dkt. No. 3.)

DISCUSSION

Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, she is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)).

Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued.

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants DeCicco of Katonah, LLC, James Capriotti, and Christina DeCicco through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants.

If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if her address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

CONCLUSION

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses for Defendants DeCicco of Katonah, LLC, James Capriotti, and Christina DeCicco, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these Defendants, and deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service.

The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

1. DeCicco of Katonah, LLC

230 Congers Road

New City, NY 10956

2. James Capriotti

180 S. Main Street

New City, NY 10956

3. Christina DeCicco

230 Congers Road

New City, NY 10956


Summaries of

Herschman v. Decicco of Katonah, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 27, 2022
22-CV-8890 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Herschman v. Decicco of Katonah, LLC

Case Details

Full title:VICKI HERSCHMAN, Plaintiff, v. DeCICCO OF KATONAH, LLC; JAMES CAPRIOTTI…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

22-CV-8890 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2022)