From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herron v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2017
No. 14-16134 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)

Opinion

No. 14-16134

02-13-2017

WILLIAM HERRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERI & SONS FARMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00075-HDM-VPC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 9, 2017 San Francisco, California Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). --------

William Herron appeals the district court's summary judgment in his action alleging that Peri & Sons Farms, Inc., discriminated against him by terminating his employment as a maintenance mechanic and failing to accommodate his bad back in violation of Americans with Disabilities Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Samper v. Providence St. Vincent Med. Ctr., 675 F.3d 1233, 1235 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Herron failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he was "'a qualified individual able to perform the essential functions of the job with reasonable accommodation.'" Id. at 1237 (citation omitted) (setting out requirements for a prima facie case of failure to accommodate); see also id. (to determine whether an individual is qualified, "'[t]he court first examines whether the individual satisfies the requisite skill, experience, education, and other job-related requirements of the position'" (citation omitted)); Snead v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 237 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2001) (same requirements for a prima facie case of disability discrimination). The record shows that the maintenance mechanic position for which Herron was hired required a certificate of completion or equivalent from a certified trade school. It is undisputed that Herron lacked a certificate of completion from a certified trade school, and Herron provided no evidence that his various other expired certificates demonstrated equivalent training.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Herron v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2017
No. 14-16134 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Herron v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HERRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERI & SONS FARMS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 13, 2017

Citations

No. 14-16134 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)

Citing Cases

Arnold v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin.

Plaintiff has disputed neither her stated salary requirement nor her failure to demonstrate completion of the…