From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herron v. Balian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2017
Case No. 17-cv-10091 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 17-cv-10091

09-06-2017

SHAWN MICHAEL HERRON II, Plaintiff, v. GARY BALIAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT BALIAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO SERVE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m) (ECF #17) AND (2) DISMISSING THE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT BALIAN WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On January 11, 2017, Plaintiff Shawn Michael Herron II brought this action against Defendants Gary Balian, John Ditchman, and Dan Wilkinson. Now before the Court is Defendant Balian's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) (the "Motion"). (See ECF #17.)

On July 31, 2017, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant the Motion and dismiss Herron's claims against Balian without prejudice (the "R&R"). (See ECF #20.) At the conclusion of the R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that if they wanted to seek review of her recommendation, they needed to file specific objections with the Court within fourteen days. (See id. at Pg. ID 151-52.)

Herron has not filed any objections to the R&R. The failure to file objections to an R&R waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to an R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, because Herron has failed to file any objections to the R&R, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant the Motion is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) Balian's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Serve Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) (ECF #17) is GRANTED and (2) the claims against Balian are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

s/Matthew F. Leitman

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 6, 2017

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 6, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.

s/Holly A. Monda

Case Manager

(810) 341-9764


Summaries of

Herron v. Balian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2017
Case No. 17-cv-10091 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Herron v. Balian

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN MICHAEL HERRON II, Plaintiff, v. GARY BALIAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2017

Citations

Case No. 17-cv-10091 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 6, 2017)