From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrold v. Yost

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-126J (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-126J.

June 30, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for a Report and Recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 16, 2006, docket no. 4, recommending that the petition be summarily dismissed.

The petitioner was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), he had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed objections on June 20, 2006, docket no. 5, but the objections are meritless.

After de novo review of the record of this matter, together with the Report and Recommendation and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2006, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Herrold v. Yost

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 30, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-126J (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Herrold v. Yost

Case Details

Full title:GENE ALLEN HERROLD, Petitioner, v. JOHN YOST, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 30, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-126J (W.D. Pa. Jun. 30, 2006)