From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrmann v. Worthington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1903
89 App. Div. 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)

Opinion

December, 1903.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Hamilton Odell, Esq., referee. Bartlett, Woodward, Hirschberg and Jenks, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented. Order granting extra allowance affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Bartlett, Woodward, Hirschberg, Jenks and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

The following is the opinion of Hamilton Odell, Esq., referee. —


For reasons stated in the opinion written in the case of Worthington v. Herrmann ( ante, p. 627), there must be judgment in this action for the defendants dismissing the complaint. I think that such judgment should be ordered for the further reason that, by operation of the third article of the agreement of April 10, 1899, the plaintiff is estopped from asserting the claims for alleged damages on which he seeks to recover in this action.


Summaries of

Herrmann v. Worthington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1903
89 App. Div. 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Case details for

Herrmann v. Worthington

Case Details

Full title:Theodore L. Herrmann, Appellant, v. Charles C. Worthington and Theodore F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1903

Citations

89 App. Div. 631 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)