From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrmann v. Schlenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Order, in so far as it denies motion to strike out the first separate and distinct defense in the second amended answer and to dismiss the counterclaim, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion in these respects granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondent to plead over within ten days. Said defense is insufficient in law, and the counterclaim does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herrmann v. Schlenger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Herrmann v. Schlenger

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. HERRMANN, Appellant, v. BERNARD SCHLENGER, Respondent, and LILLIAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)