From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrington v. Herrington

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 4, 1973
200 S.E.2d 867 (Ga. 1973)

Opinion

28022.

SUBMITTED JUNE 15, 1973.

DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1973.

Contempt. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Hardin.

Jeanne D. Harrison, Allgood Childs, Emmett P. Johnson, for appellant.


This is an appeal from a contempt judgment. The trial court held the appellant in contempt for failing to comply with the terms of a former divorce decree.

However, in its contempt judgment the trial court modified custody and visitation provisions which had been included in the divorce decree.

The appellant's main contention here is that a contempt judgment cannot modify the terms of an earlier divorce decree. We agree with the appellant on this issue. It has been repeatedly held that the trial judge has no authority in a contempt proceeding to modify the terms of a divorce and alimony judgment. See Beach v. Beach, 224 Ga. 701 ( 164 S.E.2d 114) and cases cited therein.

We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court with direction that all provisions in the contempt judgment that modified the terms of the divorce decree with respect to custody and visitation rights be deleted from the contempt judgment.

Judgment affirmed with direction. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED JUNE 15, 1973 — DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1973.


Summaries of

Herrington v. Herrington

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 4, 1973
200 S.E.2d 867 (Ga. 1973)
Case details for

Herrington v. Herrington

Case Details

Full title:HERRINGTON v. HERRINGTON

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 4, 1973

Citations

200 S.E.2d 867 (Ga. 1973)
200 S.E.2d 867

Citing Cases

Young v. Young

1. The trial court has no authority in a contempt proceeding to modify the terms of a divorce and alimony…

Skinner v. Skinner

After the term at which it was rendered, an alimony and child support award can only be modified by the court…