53 P.3d 1019 (Wash.App. Div. 1 2002) Herbert HERRINGTON and Jean Herrington, husband and wife, and their marital community; Glenn Kramer, Kay Kagey, and Jewel Armstrong, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated, Appellants, v. DAVID D. HAWTHORNE, CPA, P.S., a Washington professional service corporation; David D. Hawthorne and Jane Doe Hawthorne, husband and wife, and their marital community; Tollefsens&sCompany P.C. Business Lawyers, an Oregon corporation; John Tollefsen and Jane Doe Tollefsen, husband and wife, and their marital community; Robert A. Kaye and Jane Doe Kaye, husband and wife, and their marital community; John A. Duke as trustee of the John A. Duke Trust and John A. Duke and Jane Doe Duke, husband and wife, and their marital community; Sandra Kintner and William Kintner, husband and wife, and their marital community, Respondents. No. 47962-8-I Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1 August 13, 2002 Cox, A.C.J., Kennedy, J., Baker, J.
ORDER AMENDED OPINION AND DENIED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Respondent, John and Marilyn Duke, filed a Motion for Reconsideration. The panel hearing the case has considered the motion and a majority has determined that it should be denied. The panel has also decided to amend the opinion. Now, therefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
1. The opinion of the captioned case, which was filed on May 20, 2002, and reported at 111 Wn.App. 824, 47 P.3d 567 (2002), should be amended as follows:
On page 829, line 4, the sentence that reads " The class action lawsuit is limited ... July 31, 1997." should be stricken. The remainder of the opinion shall remain the same.2. The motion for reconsideration is denied.