From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herring v. Hooper

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Aug 25, 2022
CIVIL ACT. 2:20-cv-512-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 25, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL ACT. 2:20-cv-512-ECM (WO)

08-25-2022

CHARLES TED HERRING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROSALYN M. HOOPER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EMILY C. MARKS, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On August 4, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 50) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. The Plaintiffs' motion to amend (doc. 45) is GRANTED.

3. The motions to dismiss (docs. 46 and 47) are GRANTED such that Sandra Ann Stokes' claims are DISMISSED without prejudice and Charles Ted Herring's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.

4. This case is DISMISSED.

A separate Final Judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Herring v. Hooper

United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama
Aug 25, 2022
CIVIL ACT. 2:20-cv-512-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Herring v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES TED HERRING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROSALYN M. HOOPER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Alabama

Date published: Aug 25, 2022

Citations

CIVIL ACT. 2:20-cv-512-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Aug. 25, 2022)