From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrin v. Brister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jun 5, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-578 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 5, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-578

06-05-2020

JAMES MARK HERRIN, Plaintiff, v. GRAY BRISTER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff James Mark Herrin, a prisoner confined at the Jasper County Jail, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Gray Brister, Nurse Newman, Kenneth Hammock, and Raymond Kosub.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#6) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 5th day of June, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Herrin v. Brister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jun 5, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-578 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Herrin v. Brister

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MARK HERRIN, Plaintiff, v. GRAY BRISTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 5, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:19-CV-578 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 5, 2020)