Opinion
Case No. 13-CV-10836
11-21-2013
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #13) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 8) AND GRANTING
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 12)
Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, which were referred to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. On October 11, 2013, Magistrate Judge Mark Randon issued his report, recommending that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and affirm the findings of the Commissioner.
The magistrate judge specifically stated that any objections to his report were to be filed within 14 days of service, and that failure to file such objections constituted a waiver of any further right of appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). No such objections were filed by either party.
The court has reviewed the record and briefing in this matter, as well as the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Finding that report and recommendation to be well-reasoned, the court hereby adopts the result recommended therein. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Judgment will enter for the defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on November 21, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk