From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 27, 2021
20 Civ. 2957 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 2957 (LGS)

01-27-2021

CURT HERRERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

:

WHEREAS, on January 4, 2021, Petitioner Curt Herrera, proceeding pro se, moved for appointment of counsel to assist him in preparing a motion for sentence reduction or compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic (the "Motion"). Dkt. No. 21.

WHEREAS, "there is no statutory right to counsel under the Criminal Justice Act in connection with a § 3582(c) motion, and . . . the provision of such counsel should rest in the discretion of the district court." United States v. Cirineo, 372 F. App'x 178, 179 (2d Cir. 2010) (summary order) (citing United States v. Reddick, 53 F.3d 462, 464-65 (2d Cir. 1995)); accord United States v. Dussard, No. 16 Crim. 673-2, 2020 WL 6263575, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2020). The merits of a motion for compassionate release are a "significant factor in the exercise of that discretion." Reddick, 53 F.3d at 465 n.2; accord Dussard, 2020 WL 6263575 at *3.

WHEREAS, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) provides that the court "may reduce the term of imprisonment" only if it finds that "extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction . . . and that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission."

WHEREAS, the Court is not at this time appointing counsel to represent Petitioner in connection with the Motion and is obtaining additional information before issuing a decision on Petitioner's request that the Court appoint counsel. It is hereby

ORDERED that because the merits of a motion for compassionate relief are a significant factor in the Court's decision as to whether to appoint counsel, by February 5, 2020, the Government (1) shall obtain and send a complete set of Petitioner's updated BOP medical records to the chambers e-mail address, (2) shall file a letter summarizing or highlighting any pertinent portion of such medical records and provide any other facts that the Government believes to be relevant to Petitioner's proposed motion and (3) shall transmit a copy of such medical records to Petitioner along with a copy of this Order. Dated: January 27, 2021

New York, New York

/s/ _________

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Herrera v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 27, 2021
20 Civ. 2957 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Herrera v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CURT HERRERA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 27, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 2957 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 27, 2021)