From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 17, 2021
328 So. 3d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D19-3879

11-17-2021

Ramon HERRERA, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Ramon Herrera, pro se, Petitioner. Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Ramon Herrera, pro se, Petitioner.

Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Rowe, C.J., and B.L. Thomas and Ray, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herrera v. Inch

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 17, 2021
328 So. 3d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Herrera v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:Ramon HERRERA, Petitioner, v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

328 So. 3d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)