From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Inch

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 17, 2021
No. 1D19-3879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1D19-3879

11-17-2021

Ramon Herrera, Petitioner, v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Ramon Herrera, pro se, Petitioner. Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari-Original Jurisdiction.

Ramon Herrera, pro se, Petitioner.

Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, and Daniel R. Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

ROWE, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and RAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herrera v. Inch

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 17, 2021
No. 1D19-3879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Herrera v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:Ramon Herrera, Petitioner, v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

No. 1D19-3879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 17, 2021)