From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Gipson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 4, 2015
2:12-cv-00508-KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2015)

Opinion

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, CATHERINE CHATMAN, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, A. KAY LAUTERBACH, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Respondent.

          MICHAEL B. BIGELOW, Attorney for Petitioner, Robert Herrera.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY AND EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         The parties in the above-captioned matter have met and conferred and have agreed to continue the hearing dates on petitioner's discovery motion (Court's Electronic Docket No. 88) and have also agreed to continue the date for the evidentiary hearing.

         Petitioner's discovery motion is currently set for hearing on March 13, 2015. The parties have stipulated to continue that hearing date to March 27, 2015.

         The evidentiary hearing is currently set to start on April 27, 2015. The parties have stipulated to continue that date to July 20, 2015.

         The parties have been diligently pursuing discovery and the petitioner's deposition is set to take place on March 17, 2015. Consequently, the matter will not be sufficiently prepared for hearing on the date presently set for the evidentiary hearing.

         Accordingly, it is respectfully requested by both parties that the hearing on petitioner's discovery motion be continued to March 27, 2015 and the evidentiary hearing moved to July 20, 2015.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the hearing on petitioner's discovery motion in the above-captioned matter is continued to March 27, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 27. Pursuant to Local rule 230, respondent must file and serve any opposition to the motion 14 days before the hearing and petitioner must file and serve any reply 7 days before the hearing.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the evidentiary hearing in the above-captioned matter is continued to July 20, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 27.


Summaries of

Herrera v. Gipson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 4, 2015
2:12-cv-00508-KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Herrera v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO HERRERA, Petitioner, v. CONNIE GIPSON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 4, 2015

Citations

2:12-cv-00508-KJM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2015)