From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herren v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance Company

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2007
2:06-cv-2695-GEB-EFB-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2695-GEB-EFB-PS.

August 30, 2007


ORDER


On July 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 27, 2007, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.


Summaries of

Herren v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance Company

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2007
2:06-cv-2695-GEB-EFB-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Herren v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE HERREN, Plaintiff, v. ST. PAUL TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

Citations

2:06-cv-2695-GEB-EFB-PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)