From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herouard v. Schramm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 2002
294 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90376

May 9, 2002.

Marc Herouard, Beacon, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered October 18, 2001 in Albany County, which, inter alia, upon reconsideration, granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule, and (2) from an order of said court, entered December 4, 2001 in Albany County, which denied petitioner's application pursuant to CPLR 8601 for litigation-related expenses.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding to obtain review of an administrative determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits harassment. Supreme Court ultimately granted petitioner's application, annulling the administrative determination and remitting the matter to the Department of Correctional Services for a new hearing. The determination finding petitioner guilty of harassment was thereafter administratively reversed and all references to the charge or the previous disciplinary hearing were expunged from petitioner's prison records.

Petitioner seeks this Court's review of that part of Supreme Court's judgment which remitted his disciplinary proceeding for a new administrative hearing. As the charge that gave rise to the proceeding is no longer pending against petitioner, there is no need for a new hearing. Petitioner is no longer an aggrieved party, having already received the relief sought in his petition (see, Matter of Alstranner v. Selsky, 238 A.D.2d 658, 658). This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Smalley v. Hogue, 278 A.D.2d 753; Matter of Soto v. Coughlin, 212 A.D.2d 925).

By letter to the Clerk of this Court, dated January 22, 2002, petitioner informally withdrew his opposition to Supreme Court's order, entered December 4, 2001, on the ground that Supreme Court has since reversed itself and granted his application for litigation-related expenses.

Cardona, P.J., Crew II, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Herouard v. Schramm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 2002
294 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Herouard v. Schramm

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARC HEROUARD, Appellant, v. DONALD J. SCHRAMM, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 9, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 459

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Jefferson v. Siegel

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this original CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking, inter alia, judgment…