From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herold v. Wills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1953
282 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

June 16, 1953.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See post, p. 835.]


We agree with Special Term that the first cause of action herein referrable to the original complaint is not barred by the Statute of Limitations. We think that the pleading of the second cause of action should have been permitted, subject to any motion defendant may see fit to make with respect thereto. Order unanimously modified to eliminate the provision striking out the second cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed. Order [denying motion to include second cause of action in complaint] unanimously reversed and the motion granted. Settle orders on notice.


Summaries of

Herold v. Wills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1953
282 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Herold v. Wills

Case Details

Full title:PAUL J. HEROLD, Respondent-Appellant, v. F. REED WILLS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)