From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herold v. Indymac

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-02204-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-02204-KJD-GWF

10-20-2011

BETTY R. HEROLD, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff's complaint was filed on December 20, 2010. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint to be made upon a defendant 120 days after the filing of the complaint. The 120 day time period for effecting service of the summons and complaint upon Defendant Indymac expired no later than April 19, 2011. On October 5, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later than October 18, 2011, and warned Plaintiff that failure to do so would result in the complaint against Indymac being dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff has failed to file proof of service on Defendant Indymac, or to otherwise respond to the Court's order. Therefore, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice against Defendant Indymac for failure to serve Defendant in compliance with Rule 4(m). The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Kent J. Dawson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Herold v. Indymac

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 20, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-02204-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Herold v. Indymac

Case Details

Full title:BETTY R. HEROLD, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-02204-KJD-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2011)