Herndon v. Crowley

Full title: PHILLIP HERNDON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. CROWLEY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 17, 2006

Case No. 2:99-CV-137 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:99-CV-137.

February 17, 2006

ORDER

RICHARD ENSLEN, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Phillip Herndon's Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). Plaintiff's Motion is basically a citation list of case law nearly a page in length. Beyond these citations, Plaintiff has not demonstrated any reason justifying relief from the operation of the Court's Judgment.

Furthermore, Plaintiff's Motion is brought almost four years after the Court entered Judgment against him. Plaintiff has not articulated any reason for his delay. The Court finds the Motion has not been brought within a reasonable time. See FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b); Olle v. Henry Wright Corp., 910 F.2d 357, 365 (6th Cir. 1990). Finally, Plaintiff has neglected to sign the Motion. See FED. R. CIV. P. 11.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Phillip Herndon's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Dkt. No. 101) is DENIED.