From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Warsinske

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 11, 2022
No. 1D22-0497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-0497

05-11-2022

Joseph Hernandez, Appellant, v. Michael Warsinske, Appellee.

David E. Williamson of John F. Hayter, Attorney at Law, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant. Capri Trigo of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Miami, for Appellee.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Donna M. Keim, Judge.

David E. Williamson of John F. Hayter, Attorney at Law, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant.

Capri Trigo of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Miami, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

The order that the appellant asks this court to review did not conclusively determine "as a matter of law" that there was no settlement agreement between the parties. Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ix). Rather, the order made a passing reference to a settlement agreement not being finalized as the reason the appellant would not be held in contempt for failure to comply with an earlier court order.

The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Cf. Powell v. Woodard, 300 So.3d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020).

Roberts, Osterhaus, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Warsinske

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
May 11, 2022
No. 1D22-0497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Warsinske

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Hernandez, Appellant, v. Michael Warsinske, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: May 11, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-0497 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 11, 2022)