From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Walmart Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 21, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-0508-SU (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-0508-SU

08-21-2020

MICHAEL J. HERNANDEZ; ILANA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WALMART INC., Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [ECF 25] on July 23, 2020, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Magistrate Judge's Order to Show Cause [ECF 24]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation [ECF 25]. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 21, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Walmart Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 21, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-0508-SU (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Walmart Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. HERNANDEZ; ILANA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WALMART INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 21, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-0508-SU (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2020)