From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Wachovia Mortg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00054-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-00054-JCM-PAL

04-15-2013

RHODERA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the court is the parties' proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #12) requesting special scheduling review.

The court entered a standard Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #11) on April 11, 2013, when the parties failed to timely file one. Pursuant to LR 26-1(e) the court entered a standard order giving the parties 180 days from the filing of the Answer in which to complete discovery and other related deadlines. The parties' proposed discovery plan requests special scheduling review. However, the proposed discovery plan does not comply with LR 26-1 which requires a statement of reasons why more time is requested than what is deemed presumptively reasonable. As such,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties' proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #12) requesting special scheduling review is DENIED. The parties' deadlines established by the court's Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #11) entered April 11, 2013, shall apply.

________________

Peggy A. Leen

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Wachovia Mortg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-00054-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Wachovia Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:RHODERA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-00054-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Apr. 15, 2013)