From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Venning

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 25, 2023
5:23-cv-318-JA-PRL (M.D. Fla. May. 25, 2023)

Opinion

5:23-cv-318-JA-PRL

05-25-2023

TINA MARIE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM DOUGLAS VENNING and CAL-CLEVE LIMITED A/K/A DOT-LINE TRANSPORTATION, Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN ANTOON II, United States District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants' Notice of Removal (Doc. 1).

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. “[B]ecause a federal court is powerless to act beyond its statutory grant of subject matter jurisdiction, a court must zealously insure that jurisdiction exists over a case, and should itself raise the question of subject matter jurisdiction at any point in the litigation where a doubt about jurisdiction arises.” Smith v. GTE Corp., 236 F.3d 1292, 1299 (11th Cir. 2001).

Plaintiff, Tina Marie Hernandez, filed this case in state court on March 17, 2023. (Doc. 1-1). Defendants then removed it to this Court, invoking the Court's diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Doc. 1). But Defendants have not sufficiently alleged diversity of citizenship. In the Notice of Removal, Defendants provide the states of residence of Plaintiff and the individual Defendant, William Douglas Venning. (See Doc. 1 at 2). However, “[r]esidence alone is not enough” to establish citizenship. Travaglio v. Am. Express Co., 735 F.3d 1266, 1269 (11th Cir. 2013).

Citizenship is equivalent to ‘domicile' for purposes of diversity jurisdiction.” McCormick v. Aderholt, 293 F.3d 1254, 1257 (11th Cir. 2002). “A person s domicile is the place of his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to which he has the intention of returning whenever he is absent therefrom . . . .” TGL at 1257-58 (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Mas v. Perry, 489 F.2d 1396, 1399 (5th Cir. 1974)). That a party may be a resident of a certain state does not establish that state as his or her domicile. Thus, the Court cannot discern the citizenships of the individual parties or determine whether the parties are diverse.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that no later than June 9, 2023, Defendants shall file an amended notice of removal identifying the citizenship- not merely the residence-of each party.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Venning

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 25, 2023
5:23-cv-318-JA-PRL (M.D. Fla. May. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Venning

Case Details

Full title:TINA MARIE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM DOUGLAS VENNING and CAL-CLEVE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: May 25, 2023

Citations

5:23-cv-318-JA-PRL (M.D. Fla. May. 25, 2023)