From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 29, 1998
713 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2666

Opinion filed July 29, 1998. JULY TERM, A.D. 1998

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Ruth Becker, Judge. L.T. No. 97-66

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm defendant's convictions as to counts II and III, finding no merit as to the issue raised attacking those convictions. However, we reverse defendant's conviction as to count I, violation of a domestic violence injunction, based onCordova v. State, 675 So.2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), because the trial court erred in taking judicial notice "of the fact [that] the court file does reflect that the defendant was personally served with a copy of the injunction." Pursuant to Cordova, 675 So.2d at 636, it was improper for the court to take judicial notice of the fact that defendant was served with a copy of the injunction. As service of the injunction was an element of the state's case, and the state did not prove service on defendant, defendant was entitled to a judgment of acquittal on this count.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 29, 1998
713 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Hernandez v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HERNANDEZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 29, 1998

Citations

713 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Suggs v. State

Proof of service of the permanent injunction was required in order for Suggs to be convicted of violating the…