From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 13, 1966
181 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 65-373.

December 7, 1965. Rehearing Denied January 13, 1966.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Jack M. Turner, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Herbert P. Benn, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.


By this appeal, the appellant [defendant in the trial court] seeks review of a jury verdict rendered against him, finding him guilty of second degree murder and adjudication and sentence thereon. The only point preserved for review was the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdict.

We have examined the record and find competent, sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction and, therefore, we are required to sustain it. See: Di Bona v. State, Fla. App. 1960, 121 So.2d 192; Hicks v. State, Fla.App. 1962, 138 So.2d 101; Crum v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 172 So.2d 24.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 13, 1966
181 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Hernandez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 13, 1966

Citations

181 So. 2d 190 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)