From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 1990
563 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2223.

July 3, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County; L. Arthur Lawrence, Judge.

Donald K. Rudser, Jasper, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.


Appellants Hernandez and Martinez appeal their judgments and sentences imposed after a jury found them guilty of the offenses of sale of cocaine, possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Appellants' counsel has filed a brief which complies with the guidelines enunciated in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and states that he is unable to make an argument that any reversible error occurred in the trial court proceedings.

We find no error with respect to the judgments and sentences. However, we find we must reverse the imposition of statutory court costs because they were imposed without notice and an opportunity to object. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Harris v. State, 561 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). The state may seek reassessment of the costs after proper notice and a hearing.

Accordingly, this cause is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 3, 1990
563 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Hernandez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JORGE ARMANDA HERNANDEZ AND TRANGULINO MARTINEZ, APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 3, 1990

Citations

563 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)