From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Singh Jagmohan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
1:20-cv-00723-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00723-SAB

09-30-2021

DAVID HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. SINGH JAGMOHAN, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)

(ECF No. 26)

On September 29, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 26.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action is terminated by operation of law, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs of attorneys' fees.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Singh Jagmohan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
1:20-cv-00723-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Singh Jagmohan

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. SINGH JAGMOHAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00723-SAB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)