From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Nor-Cal Moving Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
Case No. 12-CV-05552 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-CV-05552 MEJ

05-13-2013

LIBORIO HERNANDEZ and ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ Plaintiffs, v. NOR-CAL MOVING SERVICES, Defendant.

TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555 HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LIBORIO HERNANDEZ and ROGELIO RODRIGEZ-PEREZ JOANNA L. BROOKS (State Bar No. 182986) DOUGLAS M. BRIA (State Bar No. 226966) DAVID T. WANG (State Bar No. 275015) JACKSON LEWIS LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT NOR-CAL MOVING SERVICES


TOMAS E. MARGAIN, Bar No. 193555
HUY TRAN, Bar No. 288196
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
LIBORIO HERNANDEZ and
ROGELIO RODRIGEZ-PEREZ
JOANNA L. BROOKS (State Bar No. 182986)
DOUGLAS M. BRIA (State Bar No. 226966)
DAVID T. WANG (State Bar No. 275015)
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
NOR-CAL MOVING SERVICES

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS'

LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs LIBORIO HERNANDEZ and ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ and Defendant NOR-CAL MOVING SERVICES through their attorneys of record, hereby submit the following Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Leave to File Second Amended Complaint.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the original Complaint in this action on October 29, 2012;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on April 19, 2013 after Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss or Strike on April 12, 2013;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs desire to file a Second Amended Complaint which removes all language under pendant State claims that the matter is being litigated as a representative action or that Plaintiffs will comply with California Civil Procedure Class Action requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated that:

1. Plaintiffs may file the Second Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A and containing redlined amendments to the First Amended Complaint.
2. Defendant does not oppose the Amendment.
3. Defendant will file an answer or other responsive pleading within 21 days from the date of filing of the Second Amended Complaint.

FOR PLAINTIFFS

By: _______________

Tomas E. Margain

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LIBORIO HERNANDEZ and

ROGELIO RODRIGEZ-PEREZ

FOR DEFENDANT

By: _______________

JoAnna L. Brooks

Douglas M. Bria

David T. Wang

Attorneys for Defendant

NOR-CAL MOVING SERVICES

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation and GOOD CAUSE shown Plaintiffs are hereby granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint which removes stray language that the matter is being brought as a representative action.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

HON. MARIA ELENA JAMES

Magistrate Judge of the United States

District Court


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Nor-Cal Moving Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 13, 2013
Case No. 12-CV-05552 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Nor-Cal Moving Servs.

Case Details

Full title:LIBORIO HERNANDEZ and ROGELIO RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ Plaintiffs, v. NOR-CAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-CV-05552 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2013)