From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 24, 2008
265 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-76099.

Submitted January 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 24, 2008.

Anthony D. Agpaoa, Law Office of Anthony D. Agpaoa, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Anthony P. Nicastro, Esq., Molly L. Debusschere, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A75-718-443.

Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Jose Luis Martinez Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. See Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to remand where Martinez Hernandez did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for adjustment of status. See id. at 994.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 24, 2008
265 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Jose Luis Martinez HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 24, 2008

Citations

265 F. App'x 505 (9th Cir. 2008)