From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2015
Case No. CV 12-265-RGK (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Summary

finding Graham inapplicable despite the fact that the petitioner was convicted of felony murder, which did not require a finding that the petitioner was the actual killer or possessed any intent to kill

Summary of this case from Rafferty v. Ed Sheldon

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-265-RGK (SP)

01-09-2015

ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. M.D. McDONALD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 9, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hernandez v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 9, 2015
Case No. CV 12-265-RGK (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

finding Graham inapplicable despite the fact that the petitioner was convicted of felony murder, which did not require a finding that the petitioner was the actual killer or possessed any intent to kill

Summary of this case from Rafferty v. Ed Sheldon
Case details for

Hernandez v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. M.D. McDONALD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 12-265-RGK (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Rafferty v. Ed Sheldon

However, the Supreme Court did not clearly make that a part of its holding, as it only expressly prohibited…