From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Martichick

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-2375 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2375 JAM CKD P

06-28-2021

ANTHONY CEASAR HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MARTICHICK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 7) is denied.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Martichick

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-2375 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Martichick

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CEASAR HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MARTICHICK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-2375 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)