From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 5, 2005
2005 Ohio 6400 (Ohio 2005)

Opinion

No. 2005-2258.

December 5, 2005.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St. 3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file a return of writ within fifteen days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within five days after the return is filed. Petitioner's physical presence before the court is not required.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 5, 2005
2005 Ohio 6400 (Ohio 2005)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:Hernandez v. Kelly

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 5, 2005

Citations

2005 Ohio 6400 (Ohio 2005)
2005 Ohio 6400
838 N.E.2d 670

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Louis v. Forshey

Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela, 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d…

Simmons v. Black

Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. SeeReed v. Kinkela , 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d…