From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Jonthrey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 26, 2021
2:21-CV-0755-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-0755-DMC-P

07-26-2021

ANTHONY CEASAR HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. JONTHREY, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 8. Because no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed, leave of court is not required and the action is dismissed on Plaintiffs notice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 8 as a pending motion and close this file.

Plaintiffs request to be relieved off the obligation to pay the full filing fee is denied. The relevant portion of the in forma pauperis statute does not permit the relief Plaintiff seeks. Specifically, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) mandates “the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.” The statute does not provide an exception if the action is voluntarily dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Jonthrey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 26, 2021
2:21-CV-0755-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Jonthrey

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CEASAR HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. JONTHREY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-0755-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2021)