From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2016
CASE NO. CV 14-7561-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 14-7561-JLS (PJW)

12-22-2016

JOSHUA HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). DATED: 12/22/16.

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2016
CASE NO. CV 14-7561-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. K. HOLLAND, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 22, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. CV 14-7561-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2016)