From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Hartly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01953-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01953-BNB

01-25-2012

ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, Applicant, v. STEVE HARTLY, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents.


ORDER

Following review of Respondents' Motion to Dismiss, the Court has found a discrepancy in Respondents citations to both Exhibit A and Exhibit B. In more than one instance, Respondents refer to pages five and eight in Exhibit B. There are only three pages included in Exhibit B. Also, Respondents assert that Exhibit B includes information regarding 1996 decisions by the Colorado Court of Appeals and the Colorado Supreme Court. The information included in Exhibit B only appears to address filings before these courts in 2005.

Respondents are directed to review all citations, make the necessary corrections, and provide additional documentation as needed. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this Order Respondents shall supplement the Motion to Dismiss as directed above. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant shall have twenty-one days from the date Respondents file a Supplement to file a Supplemental Reply.

DATED January 25, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Boyd N. Boland

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Hartly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 25, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01953-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Hartly

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HERNANDEZ, Applicant, v. STEVE HARTLY, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01953-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 25, 2012)