From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2012
Case No. 2:09-CV-167 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-CV-167

03-21-2012

AGUSTINE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK T. HARRINGTON, Defendant.


Hon. Gordon J. Quist


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on March 2, 2012. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed March 2, 2012, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment (docket no. 39) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted with regard to Plaintiff's official capacity claims and denied with regard to Plaintiff's individual capacity claims.

_________________

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 21, 2012
Case No. 2:09-CV-167 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Harrington

Case Details

Full title:AGUSTINE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK T. HARRINGTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:09-CV-167 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2012)