From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Fantom Wire, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 1, 2007
728 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. 2007)

Opinion

No. A06-2260.

March 1, 2007.

Hon. Debra Wilson.

Scott A. Teplinsky, Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Due Sobol, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent Hernandez.

Steven T. Scharfenberg, Lynn, Scharfenberg Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents.

John H. Guthmann, Trisha A. Vicario, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug Bradt, PLLP, St. Paul, MN, for Relators.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 31, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point, of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Fantom Wire, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 1, 2007
728 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. 2007)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Fantom Wire, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Inocencio Zamorano HERNANDEZ, Employee, v. FANTOM WIRE, INC. and State…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 1, 2007

Citations

728 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. 2007)